The key to a solid argument is for the writer to facilitate the debate by including rebuttals. When writing an argument, the author should include the possible naysayers and try to not overlook possible points that readers could put criticism on. Incorporating these views (anticipated criticisms) make the argument two sided and then more interesting because it is a conversation.
Listening to what people say will give the writer insight into how to make his argument stronger because it offers more angles and points to talk about. Listening is useful because anything said in opposition to the writer’s argument can be turned in his favor. He can then overcome what opposes him without the reader thinking that he is ignoring common beliefs.
Ignoring criticism is not the way to go. Like not including what They Say, it is being arrogant, which doesn’t convince the reader to agree with the writer’s view. But including the naysayer can be a problem if the writer can’t overcome the objections being made on his argument. So the writer should include more of the ones he can fight, than of the ones he can’t fight. Including a naysayer can also alienate the reader if a stereotype is used. The reader should avoid absolutes (like “all” and “everyone”). It takes balance.
The naysayers should be given fair time to speak. This enhances the writer’s credibility, shows respect for the readers, and gives the writer more to talk about. The writer needs to have a thorough argument to persuade readers.
No comments:
Post a Comment